Helical Model of Communication

 


Frank Dance proposed a communication model inspired by a helix in 1967, known as Helical Model of Communication. A helix is a three dimensional spring like curve in the shape of a cylinder or a cone.

Helix is compared with evolution of communication of a human since birth to existence or existing moment. Helical model gives geometrical testimony of communication. The model is linear as well as circular combined and disagrees the concept of linearity and circularity individually.

 

Concept of Helical Model of Communication

Helical model of communication introduces the concept of time where continuousness of the communication process and relational interactions are very important. Communication is taken as a dynamic process in helical model of communication and it progresses with age as our experience and vocabulary increases.

At first, helical spring is small at the bottom and grows bigger as the communication progresses. The same effect can be seen with communication of humans, where you know nothing about a person at first and the knowledge grows steadily as you know the person better. It considers all the activities of the person, from the past and present.

Communication is affected by the curve from which it emerges which denotes past behavior and experiences. Slowly, the helix leaves its lower levels of behavior and grows upward in a new way. It always depends on the lowest level to form the message. Thus, the communicative relationship reaches to the next level in which people share more information.

Communication is supposed to be continuous and non-repetitive. It is always growing and accumulative.

Example of Helical Model of Communication

A child crying at birth signifies the communication of the child to its parents that he/she is alive. After some years, the child cries whenever the child needs anything like food or attention. He/she learns words and starts communicating with words.

The child learns specific languages and communicates with the people who know the language that he/she knows. Communication becomes more complex as the child grows into adult and to the existing moment. The adult uses the same pronunciations and use of words or facial expressions that he/she learned when he/she was a child. Communication is directly dependent on his/her past behavior as a child but can also modify as the person grows.

In this example, communication evolves with the child crying. This is where the helix is small at the bottom. And he continues communication, the helix gradually grows. When the communication becomes more complex, the spiral grows wider. From then on, it grows steadily as his life goes on.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Becker’s Mosaic Model of Communication

Image
Sam Becker proposed a communication model in “The Prospect of Rhetoric” (1968), which is known as Becker’s Mosaic Model of Communication. According to him, the classical models of communication are not very useful in contemporary communication. The model explains the complexity of human communication. It also describes the randomness of the origin of messages and communication as a dynamic process. The model is believed to reduce the limitations of the linear models. The model stresses the meaning of messages. The model was inspired by Marshall McLuhan’s views and metaphors of television as a collection of light and dark spots. Components of Becker’s Mosaic Model of Communication   1.       Empty cells – Unavailable messages or sources 2.       Vertical layers – Set of similar messages 3.       Cells – Messages and sources 4.       Receivers go through the cells in  ...
Read more

Gerbner's General Model of Communication (1956)

Image
Similarly to the Schramm & Osgood Circular Model, Gerbner's General Model emphasizes the dynamic nature of human communication. It also, in common with other models, such as say, David Berio's S-M-C-R model, gives prominence to the factors which may affect fidelity Gerbner's General Model   Perceptual Dimension: An 'E is an event happens in the real life and the event content or message is perceived by ‘M’ (Man or a Machine). After Perceives the message from "E" by "M" is known as 'El’. E1 is not same as like ‘E’. Because any man or machine can't perceives the whole event and they perceives only the part of the event (E1). This is known as "Perceptual Dimension". These 3 factors are involves between 'E' and 'M' ü   Selection ü   Context ü   Availability M (man or machine) cannot perceive the entire content of the event "E" So M selects the interesting or needed content from the entire ...
Read more

Barnlund’s Transactional Model of Communication

Image
  Dean Barnlund proposed a transactional model of communication in 1970 for basic interpersonal  communication  which articulates that sending and receiving of messages happens simultaneously between people which is popularly known as Barlund’s Transactional Model of Communication. The model has been further adapted and reformed by other theorists as  General Transactional Model . The model shifted from the trend of  linear model  to  dynamic  and  two way  communication model. Concepts of Barnlund’s Transactional Model of Communication        Barnlund’s Transactional Model is a  multi-layered feedback system . This is a continuous process where sender and receiver interchanges their places and both are equally important. The message passing takes place with a constant feedback being provided from both parties. A feedback for one is the message for the other. Components of Barlund’s model Cues  r...
Read more